Discussion about this post

User's avatar
J.K. Lund's avatar

Nice work here, Binder.

The only constraints to human progress are knowledge and energy capture. Stifle either one of these components, and growth and progress slow.

With energy, however, we should be cognizant of negative externalities. Coal, for example, is not a great energy source, and frankly, humanity has moved beyond it.

Coal-fired steam turbines top out at around 25 percent thermal efficiency and belch out a lot of pollution and carbon emissions.

Compare this with natural gas, which, in a CCGT, we can reach over 60 percent thermal efficiency while producing a fraction of the pollution and carbon.

Solar and wind are great, also, but anyone who cares about human progress, growth, and the environment should also be embracing nuclear.

Expand full comment
Thomas L. Hutcheson's avatar

Why not "Source as much as _optimal_ from Canadian manufactures and tech firms?"

Why not apply the same principle to agriculture and services? :)

"Don’t put all your eggs in one basket; diversify sources and build smart, distributed grids."

I agree and this is diametrically opposed to "source as much as possible ...

Absent the economic provincialism/nationalism this all seems very sensible.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts